MSP / MSSP

Protect More Customers
Without Scaling the Alert Queue.

Managed security economics break at the point where each new customer adds proportional analyst load. Autonomy is what breaks that link.

Service economics

Security Services Have a Scaling Problem.

Operating model
  • Multi-tenant operations
  • Customer separation
  • Role-based access
  • Tenant-specific policies
Efficiency
  • Policy templates
  • Endpoint inventory
  • Autonomous operations
  • Operational efficiency
Accountability
  • Escalation
  • Reporting
  • Outcome evidence
  • Auditability

Multi-Tenant Autonomous Defense.

A provider does not operate one estate; it operates many, each with its own policy, its own tolerance for autonomous action and its own reporting obligations. Tenant separation, tenant-specific authority and role-based access are the preconditions for autonomy being usable at all.

Each customer defines what may happen automatically, what requires approval and what must escalate. The provider operates them from one view without the policies bleeding across tenant boundaries.

Human Attention Where It Adds Value.

A managed provider’s margin is a function of how many endpoints one analyst can credibly cover. Every detection-first tool pushes that number down, because every detection eventually needs a human.

When routine conditions are handled autonomously within policy and only genuine exceptions escalate, the same team covers materially more estate — and the escalations that do arrive are worth their attention.

On multi-tenant capability.

Multi-tenant features described here are those the product supports or is committed to delivering. Where a specific operational requirement is critical to a provider’s model, it is worth confirming scope with the Autonomir team before designing a service around it.

See Autonomous Endpoint Defense in Operation.

Protect every endpoint. Continuously establish trust. Respond at machine speed.